Herbert Mead. Analysis Is Mind, Self, Society

Sarah Kuntz 10/4/12 Essay 2 Herbert Mead, Mind, Self, and Society Herbert Gilbert Mead, the author of Mind, Self, and Society, is introduced by Charles w. Morris which gives a perspective to Mead in advance the accumulation of his essays. Mead was influenced by Charles Darwin and Watsons behaviorism however he was greatly tilted to Watsons behaviorism. Although he considered Watsons views oversimplified he did refer him egotism to be a behaviorist. Mead goes further to mention, the denial of the private nor the neglect of consciousness, but the preliminary to all experience in terms of conduct. In his essay the Mind, Mead simplifies the orgasm to understanding the mind in simple building blocks of gestures, symbols and quarrel. Mead was trying to solving the age old question of how the mind arises. His answer was that the, Mind arises finished communication by a conversion of gestures in a loving process or context of experience-not communication through mind (p 50). These ad hoc gestures then become the symbols and are communicated to others in an approximation. Due to this communication is a constant adjustment to others and to their reactions.The future communication becomes more eminent in the beginning of actions and reactions constantly occurring. In the essay the Self, the mind gives way (in the actions and reactions) to language and symbols which then possible for development. This development is our ego and reference point for received events in our lives, emotions and different sensations (p. 136). Mead goes on to discuss how the self does arise, it arises through play, and games and the idea of generalized other. That organized community gives the individual his unity of self and the attitude of generalized other is that of the whole community (p. 155).Mead is explaining that our entire self reflects the tweaking of our self to match federation. Furthermore, the final essay the Society, he brings accumulation of ideas of the mind and the self to relate it to society. Mead mentions that insects base their societies on physiological differences unlike the man who bases society on those around him. Man is seen to constantly change his environment by the way he uses it and create a community by a common language. What one does is defined by others, such as faith or economics. Both of these call for enormous amounts of identification and needs an earshot to acknowledge this identification.So as far as he is a self, and pop of a community and his contribution is must be social (p. 324). personally I understand Meads views on how the mind can be somewhat defined by behaviors into chain reactions. However this leaves the concept of falsification and lying in behaviors. At times there is more to what meets the eye, and what is tell and understood has multiple meanings. The human mind is so complex and delimit it to just one behavior would still be simplifying the concept. I do agree with Mead on the concept of societ y. Society plays a very of import role which man will always for the most part, mirror his actions.